Return to Blog Archives>>

Notes From a Prison Visit With Weev

Gawker that his co-defendant scraped from the servers.  The interpretation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) that Weev was convicted under is controversial and the case is currently on appeal to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.  Tor Ekeland P.C. represented Weev at trial and also is representing him on appeal, along with Orin Kerr, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Marcia Hoffman, Mark Jaffe, and Nace Naumoski. The prison, Allenwood Low FCI, has the aesthetic sterility of a newly constructed high school and looks very much like one, except for the fact that it is surrounded by chain link fences and reams of razor wire.  It’s about 180 miles east of New York City on Highway 80, and I made the drive after I lost contact with Weev at the end of April. Someone who received a letter from Weev called me early this month to tell me that he had written that he had been put into administrative detention for blogging and been stripped of all his papers (including my contact info).  After repeated non-returned phone calls, emails, and faxes to the prison I was finally able to make contact with prison officials.  They would tell me nothing about my client except that he was placed in administrative detention and was under investigation for some undisclosed reason.    I was told that I could not talk to him on the phone unless a court date was imminent.  I demanded and was granted a visit. The metal detector went off when I went through it even after emptying my pockets, and taking off my belt and shoes.  I have gone through numerous metal detectors in federal and state courts and prisons and this has never happened before.  The guard implied he wasn’t going to let me in because of this, and then, taking a somewhat snide air of magnanimity, said he would make an exception for me after searching me with a metal detector wand.  I then was led to the visiting room. The visiting room was a spacious, high school cafeteria type space, with small, low, tables surrounded by plastic chairs.  Prisoners in beige jumpsuits sat around the tables interacting freely with their family and friends.  But not Weev.  He was behind plate glass, locked in a roughly 5 x 10 white cell, in an orange jump suit.  The only way to talk to him was through a phone hung on the wall, just like in the movies.  Here’s some of what he told me:

  • Since April 30, 2013, he has been in “Administrative Segregation.”  Part of this time was in solitary, but most of it has been spent in a roughly 10 x 10 cell with one cellmate.  He is only allowed out for 15 minutes at a time 3 times a week for showers.  Prisoners in “Administrative Segregation” are held in the “Special Housing Unit,” commonly referred to by its acronym “SHU.”
  • He was told by the prison authorities that he was under investigation for “abusing the telephone”.  This was  a direct response to Weev using his telephone privileges to post messages to Soundcloud. He was told that promoting a Kickstarter campaign on Soundcloud for a documentary someone was doing on him was a threat to the institution.  Previously, his prison email privileges were suspended because he was using them to post to Twitter.
  • The Prison will not tell him how long he is going to be in Administrative Segregation or when the investigation will end.  Purportedly the investigation may last 6 months, with the option to renew indefinitely.
  • Weev has not been in any fights or otherwise caused any disciplinary problems.  It appears that he is being punished purely for his speech from prison.
  • Although he has met with a prison doctor and discussed his celiac disease, his meals have not been made gluten free and as a result he often goes hungry.
  • Prison authorities threatened Weev with perpetual transfers between prisons, or transfer to a Communications Management Unit (CMU), a prison unit designed to monitor communications of convicted terrorists.  Interesting threats given the fact that Weev was convicted for a non-violent felony that harmed no-one and that has nothing to do with terrorism.
  • Weev has been denied access to his prison property while in SHU, which includes envelopes, pencils, and a notepad, so the number of envelopes and writing paper he has is extremely limited.  He has also been refused access to religious texts.  Because Weev has refused to pay roughly $50.00 a month out of his commissary fund for the fines imposed on him after his conviction, he is limited to $20.00 a month from his commissary fund.
Federal prisoners undeniably have 1st Amendment rights.  Prisons may curtail them only in the exercise of a legitimate penological interest, something that seems wanting here.  Moreover, prisoners publish from prison all the time, and the types of things they have published have included Nazi propaganda.  No doubt the prison is counting on no one noticing or caring. We are currently exploring our options on how to deal with this situation.  Feel free to donate to the cause, every little bit helps.  We may need to file in federal court in Pennsylvania in an attempt to remedy Weev’s current situation. www.cfaadefensefund.com. (Tor) Trial Docket:  U.S. v. Auernheimer, 11-CR-470 (D.N.J.) (SDW) Appeal Docket: U.S. v. Auernheimer, 13-1816 (3d Cir.)  ]]]]> ]]>

Road to Nowhere

In Liminae: The Road to Nowhere

It takes us about six hours to drive to the rural state jail (that’s owned by two judges) the Feds contracted with to hold our client. Accused of computer crimes, he can’t effectively review evidence in jail – there’s no practical access to computers in the gulag. They’ve seized all his assets claiming they’re the ill-gotten gains of crimes the government can’t identify, and their computer forensics – if you can call them that – have no scientific basis and are full of basic errors and typos. In my decade as a federal criminal defense lawyer doing computer cases across the country, I’ve never come across a case where the government was so completely off.

Read More »

Guilty Until Proven Innocent

A defendant’s view from the trenches of federal criminal court This post is originally published to Substack. You can read and follow us there. https://torekeland.substack.com/p/guilty-until-proven-innocent

Read More »

For media inquiries, please email info@torekeland.com

30 WALL STREET, 8TH FLOOR • NEW YORK, NY 10005

©2022 Tor Ekeland Law, PLLC   •  info@torekeland.com

Attorney Advertising   •   Past results do not guarantee future results   •   Licensed in New York