en banc decision in United States v. Nosal, 676 F.3d 854 (9th Cir. 2012) lays this all out and I refer the curious to it. Essentially, the court, in accordance with the majority of District Courts in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, agreed with the reasoning in Nosal and rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the broad theory of exceeding authorized access under the CFAA should apply. Here’s the decision: DRESSER-RAND COMPANY, Plainti~_1]]]]> ]]>
Webinar Invite: Michael Hassard joins a virtual panel on Intellectual Property and Smart Contracts – Oct 20, 2022 3pm ET
Firm Associate Michael Hassard will be part of a virtual panel discussion on on Intellectual Property (IP), Smart Contracts, Branding, and Usage Rights. October 20, 2022 at 3pm Eastern. Sign up to attent.