Velvet Underground’s Copyright Claim Against Warhol Foundation, Over the “Banana Album” Cover, is Dismissed. Trademark Claims Survive.

Velvet Underground and Nico, the Southern District of New York dismissed the band’s demand for a declaratory judgment that Warhol did not own the copyright.  The court held that, because the Foundation signed an unconditional covenant not to sue for copyright infringement, there was no justiciable controversy and the court could not hear the case.   Velvet Underground’s trademark claims over the iconic banana are still alive. The opinion: Velvet Underground v. Andy Warhol Foundation Notes:  The United States Supreme Court is currently hearing a case directly on point, involving whether a court can retain jurisdiction over a declaratory judgment action when the opposing party submits a covenant not to sue.  See Nike v. Already. Trademark interests and copyrights interests are distinct and unique, but these rights often collide.  It is important to understand the difference between the two and to have written agreements clarifying both. For informational purposes only.  Not legal advice.]]]]> ]]>

Interview – The World

Tor Ekeland was interviewed by public radio’s longest-running daily global news program, The World, on how the Assange ruling highlights conditions of the US prison

Read More »

On Blackstone 7: The Lost Works

For all the Originalists’ trash talk I’m shocked that most of William Blackstone’s writings are out of print. In 2016, Oxford University Press published an

Read More »

For media inquiries, please email


©2019 Tor Ekeland Law, PLLC   •  (718) 737-7264

Attorney Advertising   •   Past results do not guarantee future results   •   Licensed in New York and California