December Newsletter: Deck the Halls With Fortnite ad Copyright
Wishing you and your family a happy holidays from all of us at Tor Ekeland Law, PLLC
We will be on limited staffing for the final week of the year but will still be monitoring our consult requests. As always our emergency lines will continue to be available for our clients. We ask that you please be patient if we are slow in responding! On January 7th, 2019Join us in New York to watch Tor Ekeland and Carrie Goldberg present oral arguments in front of the 2nd circuit in Herrick v Grindr. A case at the intersection of computer & consumer law, privacy and intimate partner violence that had been called “a case to watch”. RSVP to be kept in the loop.We may retire to a local establishment afterwords to debrief. Friends of the firm will be welcome.Can You Dance If You Want To?
Two new recent copyright lawsuits involving dance moves, including one by a rapper challenging the manufacturers of the one of the most popular video games of all time, have led to questions about the extent copyright protection can extend to dance. On the surface, there’s an easy answer: the Copyright Act protects choreographic works. However, as typically happens in high-profile copyright litigation, application of the rules can be murky and policy-driven. Several years ago, rapper 2 Milly released his “Milly Rock” video, where he danced outside in his Brooklyn neighborhood. The song, and his dance move, became a hit. According to the complaint, he’s licensed the Milly Rock dance move to other artists for concerts and performances. Epic Games released Fortnite Battle Royale in 2017, a battle royale type video game where players can compete remotely and gather weapons to kill each other until the last one is alive. The game can be played for free, and Epic Games makes various features available for money, including a wide variety of dances that users can have their characters perform. Among them is the “Swipe It” dance, which appears to be lifted directly from the Milly Rock video. 2 Milly is alleging that Fortnite dance infringes his copyright on the dance move, and that Epic Games violated his right of publicity by using his likeness. The Milly Rock is hardly the only dance borrowed by Fortnite, whose characters perform everything from the “Carlton” from Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, to Elaine’s happy dance on Seinfeld. Big Freedia’s is not a copyright infringement lawsuit, at least not yet. Freedia is seeking a declaratory judgment. That is, a judgment that defendant, Choreographer Dejarnetti owns no rights to Freedia’s performances. Big Freedia is a New Orleans musician, producer, reality TV actor, and known as the “Queen of Bounce”. Freedia hired Dejarnetti to develop stage performances, including the choreography. According to the complaint, Dejarnetti spent time in the recording studio and offered suggestions. Dejarnetti is now claiming authorship in Freedia’s choreography, as well as the musical works and possibly sound recordings based on his contributions in the studio. He later demanded credit as co-author and co-producer of Freedia’s songs, and sought fees to allow Freedia to continuing using his works. It’s unclear based on this complaint what copyrightable contributions Dejarnetti claims to have made, but we will likely find out more when he responds. If Dejarnetti really does believe he owns rights, he will counterclaim for a declaration of his own rights, and perhaps for copyright infringement. (If you’re interested more in authorship rights based on in-studio contributions, I’ve written in detail about Ulloa v. Universal, a lawsuit brought by the woman who sang the chorus for Jay Z’s “Izzo/Hova”). So is a dance “copyrightable”? The quick answer is relatively uncontroversial: a “choreographic work” is a work protected under the Copyright Act, so yes. But a simple dance move is probably not sufficient for copyright protection. The Copyright Office defines a protectable choreographic work as “a composition and arrangement of a related series of dance movies and patterns of dance movements and patterns organized into a coherent whole.” However dances aren’t protected if they are:- “Commonplace movements or gestures” like the “basic waltz step” or “second position in classical ballet”
- “Short dance routines consisting of only a few movements or steps with minor linear or spatial variations, even if a routine is novel or distinctive.”
- “Functional physical movements,” even if they are “feats of physical skill or dexterity.”
Quora Announces Data Breach of 100 Million Users
-Motherboard Tech’s Invasion of Our Privacy Made Us More Paranoid in 2018 -CNET Tech Companies Slam New Australian Law Allowing Police to Spy On Smartphones -CNN Bitcoin Will Regain Its Dominance In The Cryptocurrency Markets In 2019 -Forbes How to Trademark a Sound, According to Zippo -The Drum Trademark Applications Surge as Overseas Brands Enter U.S. Market -IP Watch Dog There’s Nothing Cruller Than a Dunkin Donuts Hack -Wired Facebook Exposes Nonprofits to Donors – And Hackers -Wired How Would NYC’s Anti-Airdrop Dick Pic Law Even Work? -Wired
We are excited to announce that we are officially collaborating with Shane MacDougall of Tactical Intelligence to bring extra technical expertise to our clients. In his own words Shane explains his background and what his company, Tactical Intelligence brings to our firm: My partners & I at Tactical Intelligence are very pleased to be working with Tor Ekeland Law. I’ve known Tor for several years, and can’t wait to help him continue his defense of cybercrime cases. Our firm has a long background in doing investigative work in the digital underground world, from unmasking attackers in high profile hacking cases, to some pretty extreme skip tracing incidents. We also bring to the table almost 70 years combined experience in the hacker underground, including red teaming and blue teaming. Needless to say, our digital “reach” is very extensive. We have instructed law enforcement and intelligence agency personnel from around the world on open source intelligence (OSINT), and we’ve even won multiple contests at hacker conferences using our OSINT techniques. Bringing this capability into Tor Ekeland Law will, we feel, be one of the most synergistic integrations we’ve ever experienced. We love the underdog, and we’re extremely worried about the seemingly exponential control and misuse of the internet, and the courts, by government. We haven’t been afraid to back some of Tor’s most unpopular defendants publicly, when the criminal violations being alleged by prosecutors were warped interpretations of how internet security works. Our goal is to help complement Tor’s team with a technical depth particularly focused on the information security and hacking realm, in order to provide an additional level of defense for all of his firm’s clients. We can’t wait for the next fight to come our way. Bring it! Shane MacDougall – President, Tactical Intelligence Inc