Top
Notable Cases

Representation Shaping Computer Law

We don't turn down cases others call unwinnable. Below are matters that shaped our practice, and sometimes, computer law itself.

Discuss your matter in a confidential virtual consultation with an attorney at Tor Ekeland Law by contacting us online or at (888) 721-7680.

  • Clear All
  • Landmark CFAA Conviction Vacated on Appeal

    Our origin story. The Third Circuit unanimously vacated Andrew Auernheimer's CFAA conviction, setting precedent on computer crime venue that courts and scholars still cite. The case is the subject of the documentary Troll Inc.

    Landmark CFAA Conviction Vacated on Appeal

    United States v. Andrew Auernheimer, 748 F.3d 525 (3d Cir. 2014).

    Our origin story. The Third Circuit unanimously vacated Andrew Auernheimer's CFAA conviction, setting precedent on computer crime venue that courts and scholars still cite. The case is the subject of the documentary Troll Inc.

  • High-Profile Election Cyber Case Ends in Probation

    We represented a client accused of DDoS attacks on a congressional campaign website during a contested California election, first reported by Rolling Stone. He faced up to ten years in prison. The Firm negotiated the case down to no prison time, probation, community service, and a fine.

    High-Profile Election Cyber Case Ends in Probation

    Federal Cyberattack Prosecution, Contested California Congressional Campaign (C.D. Cal. 2024)

    We represented a client accused of DDoS attacks on a congressional campaign website during a contested California election, first reported by Rolling Stone. He faced up to ten years in prison. The Firm negotiated the case down to no prison time, probation, community service, and a fine.

  • Federal Felonies Reduced to a Single Misdemeanor

    Armed FBI agents raided a security researcher's home after he found unsecured patient data and reported it. We negotiated the federal felony computer-crime case into a single misdemeanor without a custodial sentence.

    Federal Felonies Reduced to a Single Misdemeanor

    United States v. Shafer, No. 3:17-cr-00239 (N.D. Tex. 2017), Security Researcher Raid, Resolved Without Prison Time

    Armed FBI agents raided a security researcher's home after he found unsecured patient data and reported it. We negotiated the federal felony computer-crime case into a single misdemeanor without a custodial sentence.

  • Major Financial Case Overturned on Constitutional Grounds

    The Firm represented co-defendant Anthony Conti at trial in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and on appeal from a LIBOR interest-rate-manipulation conviction. The Second Circuit reversed the conviction on Fifth Amendment grounds.

    Major Financial Case Overturned on Constitutional Grounds

    United States v. Allen, 864 F.3d 63 (2d Cir. 2017)

    The Firm represented co-defendant Anthony Conti at trial in the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and on appeal from a LIBOR interest-rate-manipulation conviction. The Second Circuit reversed the conviction on Fifth Amendment grounds.

  • Challenging Secret FISA Evidence

    The FBI obtained a FISA warrant based on allegations that Keith Gartenlaub, a Boeing IT manager, provided classified aircraft designs to China, though no evidence established that he did so. As co-counsel with John D. Cline, and later in a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, we challenged the warrant’s secrecy and argued that defendants have Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights to examine the basis for a search whose evidence is used against them.

    Challenging Secret FISA Evidence

    United States v. Gartenlaub, No. 16-50339 (9th Cir.)

    The FBI obtained a FISA warrant based on allegations that Keith Gartenlaub, a Boeing IT manager, had provided classified aircraft designs to China. No evidence has established that he did so. Nevertheless, he was convicted of a domestic offense using evidence derived from a secret FISA Court warrant, evidence he has never been permitted to review. As co-counsel with John D. Cline, and later in a petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, we challenged the warrant’s secrecy and argued that a defendant has Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights to examine the basis for a search the fruits of which he was never allowed to examine.

  • High-Profile Hacktivist Case Reaches Negotiated Outcome

    The Firm represented a hacktivist who helped expose evidence in the Steubenville sexual assault case. He faced up to sixteen years; we negotiated twenty-four months.

    High-Profile Hacktivist Case Reaches Negotiated Outcome

    United States v. Lostutter, No. 5:16-cr-00062-DCR (E.D. Ky. 2017)

    The Firm represented a hacktivist who helped expose evidence in the Steubenville sexual assault case. He faced up to sixteen years; we negotiated twenty-four months.

  • Significant Sentence Reduction in Federal Prosecution

    We represented Matthew DeHart in a high-profile federal prosecution tied to WikiLeaks-related materials and national security claims, later the subject of the documentary Enemies of the State. He faced 72 years; we negotiated seven and a half, with credit for four years already served pretrial.

    Significant Sentence Reduction in Federal Prosecution

    United States v. DeHart, No. 4:15-cr-00012 (M.D. Tenn. 2016)

    We represented Matthew DeHart in a high-profile federal prosecution tied to WikiLeaks-related materials and national security claims, later the subject of the documentary Enemies of the State. He faced 72 years; we negotiated seven and a half, with credit for four years already served pretrial.

  • Challenging Blockchain Forensics in Federal Court

    A closely watched challenge to the use of blockchain forensics in criminal prosecutions, with implications for cryptocurrency prosecutions generally. The Firm represented Sterlingov at trial and appeal, arguing the case before the D.C. Circuit.

    Challenging Blockchain Forensics in Federal Court

    United States v. Sterlingov, No. 24-3161 (D.C. Cir. filed Nov. 22, 2024)

    A closely watched challenge to the use of blockchain forensics in criminal prosecutions, with implications for cryptocurrency prosecutions generally. The Firm represented Sterlingov at trial and appeal, arguing the case before the D.C. Circuit. The link to oral arguments is below.

  • Significant Sentence Reduction After Trial

    We represented Matthew Keys in a closely followed federal prosecution over alleged unauthorized access to the Los Angeles Times’ computer systems, reducing a seven-year plea offer to thirty months after trial.

    Significant Sentence Reduction After Trial

    United States v. Keys, No. 2:13-cr-00082-KJM (E.D. Cal. 2016)

    We represented Matthew Keys in a closely followed federal prosecution over alleged unauthorized access to the Los Angeles Times’ computer systems, reducing a seven-year plea offer to thirty months after trial.

1 / 2

High-Stakes Cases

We defend the unpopular against the impossible: cases of first impression, and cases where the law hasn't caught up with the technology. If that's where you are, we want to hear from you.

Call (888) 721-7680 or reach us online to consult an attorney about your case today.

For Cases At the Edge of Technology and the Law Trial Lawyers. Strategic Counsel.
From cutting-edge computer law to federal trials and landmark appeals, we represent clients facing cases at the forefront of the law. Our selective, trial-first practice is built for complex matters where the stakes are high, the law may be unsettled, and experience can make all the difference.

Request a Confidential Consultation

We take on a limited number of matters to ensure each client receives the attention their case demands.

  • By submitting, you agree to receive text messages from Tor Ekeland Law at the number provided, including those related to your inquiry, follow-ups, and review requests, via automated technology. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Msg & data rates may apply. Msg frequency may vary. Reply STOP to cancel or HELP for assistance. Acceptable Use Policy